RNI - Republicans for the National Interest

Where Newt Gingrich Went Wrong

Michael Erickson — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:10:05 -0700

As Newt Gingrich fades in the polls for the upcoming Florida Republican primary, the prospects increase substantially that Governor Romney will win the GOP nomination. Romney is far from being a perfect candidate and will have some serious deficiencies in his appeal to "Reagan Democrats" and Independents against President Obama. As we consider where Newt Gingrich went wrong, though, a strong case may be made that his unique deficiencies have made him a particularly hard sell for Republican primary voters.

We Need to Amend our Federal Constitution to Allow for National Referendum Elections

Michael Erickson — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:37:44 -0700

A friend inquires of Michael Erickson what is to be done with an out of control federal government, if indeed the United States Constitution does not allow for a state or the states to nullify federal laws. Michael Erickson responds as follows.

State Nullification Undermines Federalism

Michael Erickson — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:24:16 -0700

In response to a letter from a friend, Michael Erickson offers his own comments with respect to the doctrine of state nullification.

Why I am Okay with the Holidays

Michael Erickson — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:45:47 -0700

Every year, like clockwork, there are an array of news stories and lawsuits regarding the extent to which the "holidays" may be referred to as "Christmas." Christian groups wage boycotts against retailers who will not say "Merry Christmas" to their customers, and right of center media like FOX News will send reporters chasing after loopy governors in State Capitols who dare to sponsor "Holiday Trees" over their Christmas counterparts. Michael Erickson offers his view on this annual controversy.

A Christian on Hitchens' Atheism and Lowe's Muslim Problem

Michael Erickson — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:56:30 -0700

Time Columnist Tim Padgett pens "A Christian on Hitchens' Atheism and Lowe's Muslim Problem," in which he castigates the fundamentalists on both sides of the question of whether there is a God. He advocates what appears to be a reasonable, middling position, one that eschews fundamentalism per se in favor of a predilection for tolerance and goodwill. Michael Erickson responds as follows.

Bachmann May Be the Best Bet - If We Insist Upon an Alternative to Romney

Michael Erickson — Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:49:07 -0700

A friend highlights a National Review critique of Newt Gingrich. In response, Michael Erickson offers his own thoughts first on Gingrich and then on the others vying for the 2012 Republican Party nomination for the Presidency.

Thoughts on the Feast Day of the Immaculate Conception of the Regina del Cielo

Michael Erickson — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:02:05 -0700

In recognition of the Feast Day of the Immaculate Conception of the Regina del Cielo, Michael Erickson offers the following thoughts in a letter to a friend.

Forgetting that We Know God in Our Estrangement from Him

Michael Erickson — Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:10:24 -0700

Michael Erickson pens a letter to a friend in which he laments how modern, Biblical hermaneutics presupposes that we cannot know God and, as such, cannot admit that there is a moral relevance in men being estranged from Him. This view has a serious, religious significance, to be sure; but, just as importantly, it implicates our American political and cultural life. He wonders how the Declaration of Independence can have any viability at all in a world where men have forgotten their estrangement from God.

Blessings for the Thanksgiving Holiday

Michael Erickson — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:44:23 -0700

Michael Erickson offers his blessings for the Thanksgiving holiday in a letter written to a friend.

The Hillary Moment

Michael Erickson — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:05:54 -0700

Democrat consultants Patrick Caddell and Douglas Schoen write an editorial recently in the Wall Street Journal, in which they argue that, for the good of both the Democrat Party and the American Nation, President Obama should decline to pursue a second term. They argue in essence that, even if he manages to win, he will have divided the electorate in such a manner as to make it virtually impossible for him to govern in his second term. In this context, they urge him to step aside, so that the Democrat Party may rally around Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a popular, respected alternative. Michael Erickson responds to the editorial as follows.