Sermon for the Feast of Corpus Christi 2009

In his capacity as a Priest in the Anglican Catholic Church, Michael Erickson delivers the sermon on the Feast of Corpus Christi 2009. In brief, he argues that the Body of Christ is to be understood in the context of the communion between God and men afforded by the loving sacrifice of Christ on the Cross and that, in order to partake of that Body, we must walk towards Him, even if haltingly, as He is walking towards each and everyone of us. In this manner, we see then that the Body of Christ is not so much a static reality as an act of love, first of God for men in Christ Jesus, then of men for God by the efficacious power of the Holy Spirit within the faithful. The sermon begins as follows: “Labour not for the meat that perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of Man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.” We today celebrate the feast of Corpus Christi, the Body of Christ, the meat indeed which endureth forever unto everlasting life. The association with the Sacrament of Communion is clear for we who have the faith to see what is now unseen, but which will be made manifest in the fullness of time: Christ, the Incarnate God, the sole Propitiation for our own sins, who in virtue of His sacrifice of Himself once offered purchases for each and every one of us that special grace by which we may be in communion with Him in consecrated bread and wine – and indeed in all of the Sacraments of the Church. It is the living testament of His love for us, that He gives Himself not only for us, but most intimately to us, forever at the right hand of God but also continually in time whenever two or more are assembled in the liturgy of Holy Communion. He is forever triumphant, the ascendant God-Man who is in His Resurrection the very expression of His defeat of sin and death; but, at the same time, He is continually humbling Himself, the languishing corpse on the crucifix, the One who empties Himself of His own divine omnipotence, so that we literally may ingest Him into and for ourselves. Christ Jesus gives Himself to us, because He is obedient unto His own Father; indeed, He does the work of His Father, so that we may do the same. In doing the work of His Father, in laboring on behalf of those men which the Father has entrusted unto Him, Christ Jesus expresses what it means for we Christians to partake in His Body. As the Father loves Him, so He loves the Father; similarly, as He forever and continually gives unto us, so we must give unto Him. Communion in the Body of Christ, that meat that never perishes, is in our halting movement towards Him as it is also in His previous and triumphant movement towards us. We cannot even commence to seek Him, let alone approach His Body in the Sacrament of Communion, without the grace afforded to us by the Holy Spirit. Indeed, God does the preponderance of the work both on His and our sides of the rail. Still, however tepidly, we must labor for Christ Jesus, we must move along that way that He has carved out for us, forsaking our attachments for His dominion, letting the dead bury themselves for His glory, so that there may be that coming together, of men for Christ and Christ for men. It is in this coming together that we find His Body and His Blood; indeed, it is in recognition of that insight that we Anglicans disavow the practice of a Priest celebrating Mass by Himself. Our labor towards Christ Jesus therefore is a most critical component to the relationship expressed by the Body of Christ. This is a blessing, an indication of our intrinsic nobility as created in the image of God, that we have been ordained to be an integral player within salvation, as much as Adam had been ordained to be an integral player within creation, as seen when God entrusts him to name all of the beasts under his dominion in Eden. God is merciful and just; therefore, His blessing also bestows that imperative of the highest order – namely, that we labor not for the meat that perisheth, but rather labor to do what God in His total wisdom has commanded unto us, that we love Him with all of our hearts, souls, and minds, and that we love our neighbors. We cannot know the Body of Christ, and for that matter cannot receive efficaciously the Sacrament of Communion, if we are living in our sins, rather than in the love of God, and if we are hating our brothers in this world. Our imperative then is to stand for Christ Jesus, even when the world persecutes us: to do what is right, to speak what is true, to conserve what is noble, to defeat what is evil, in the individual conscience and in the community at large. In our action will our conviction be made manifest, either for God or against Him, either for the salvation of our neighbors or in disregard of how they may fall to the snares of the enemy. We must approach all action in humility, ever mindful of the need for prayer to learn what indeed is the will of God in our lives; but, at the same time, we must act. We must act, because we are men, made for all time in His image and redeemed by the death of Christ on the Cross. If anyone of us is mired in a sin, then he must undertake to free himself by the forgiveness afforded through the Sacrament; if anyone of us sees a neighbor mired in sin, then he must undertake at the very least to pray for his repentance. In so acting, we move toward Christ Jesus, haltingly but as men, which is how God ordains us to be. In this do we find the Body of Christ.

The "emptying" of Christ

Dear Father, I heard your sermon on the first Sunday after Trinity at Christ Church Parish. It was very good. I was on alert for any gratuitous concession to 'transubstantiation'. There was none, but I am still pondering the benefit of Corpus Christi, especially with respect to the future of continuuing Anglicanism. I know the West, after Leo III and Chalcedon, has always emphasized the humanity of Christ. This has translated to a similar emphasis on the passion and cross (the suffering of the body and price for sin) which manifested itself in hightened penitentialism, decalogue, and atonement especially in later protestant theology. That being said, I agree with Luther, the bread is for eating (we are commanded to eat it). I believe we violate this ordinance when we consecrate bread and wine with another purpose in mind, e.g., for a parade or exhibition. The more Lutheran inclined Anglicans felt reserves were tolerabe if indeed intended for and sent to shut-ins in relatively hasty manner (two or three days). Lutherans tended to solve the theological problem of reserves by ingesting remainders and consecrating more as needed. I think this thrifty approach to reserving the sacrament is good. I have only one question regarding your sermon, and I know it's fairly pendantic, prying into the mode of eating. You say, "He is continually humbling Himself, the languishing corpse on the crucifix, the One who empties Himself of His own divine omnipotence, so that we literally may ingest Him into and for ourselves. Christ Jesus gives Himself to us". What does "emptying Himself of 'omnipotence'" mean? I don't think Christ's humiliation required the suspension of His Diety. I am probably misunderstanding your statement. I doubt you meant this since both natures--God and man, united in the single person of Jesus-- died upon the cross. He did not cease being 'omnipotent' though he did humiliate Himself. Indeed, His full deity makes this humiliation even more profound. Just as Jesus was born fully God from the womb of Mary, He likewise died as fully God at the crucifixtion. He also went to hell as fully God. ? If this is true, then I wonder what Christ's omnipotence means in our eating the bread and wine? Do we eat God between our teeth? This was something unimaginable to the Calvinists, and was one reason why Puritans rejected a localized presence. However, contemplating such stirs a great reverance in both the sacrament and the depth of God's love for His Bride. . What is the theological use of 'emptying'? Did Christ 'empty' His omnipotence or His human will? Sincerely, charles