The Real Objective Behind the "Occupy Wall Street" Movement

In response to a query from a friend, Michael Erickson offers his own thoughts on the real objective behind the "Occupy Wall Street" movement.

I concur with the fundamental insight that the "Occupy" movement is essentially a front for a large, well funded, clandestine, and insidious effort to derail our political institutions. First and foremost, it is important to understand, as surely you do, that the "Occupy" movement is not a spontaneous, grassroots uprising of citizens concerned about income inequality or crony capitalism. Certainly, there are legitimate - if misguided - activists within the crowds; but, like their counterparts in the leftist protests of the 1960s, they are the "useful idiots" of people with a much more belligerent agenda. Most of the agitators are not the "legitimate activists," at least not in recent weeks; rather, most of them are "rent a mob" scum - often hired by labor unions and other leftist organizations to suggest that there is a greater affinity for the leftist agenda than in fact exists - and pot smoking anarchists. This is why they are becoming more violent and, concomitantly, less acceptable to rank and file Americans.

On the surface, the "Occupy" movement is about derailing capitalism; and there is no doubt in my mind that that is the fundamental goal of the "useful idiots" on the streets. The people behind this movement, nevertheless, have a different agenda, in my opinion. After all, much of the behind the scenes financial support for the "Occupy" movement may be traced to the modern day "Dr. Strangelove" of the political left, George Soros. Soros is a leftist scumbag, to be sure; but he is hardly anti-business, at least with respect to the business and financial ventures that enrich his own pocketbook. There are others, less known but just as insidious in this pursuit, who finance leftist agitators, because they stand to amass wealth or political power for themselves from whatever turbulence the agitators manage to reap. For the "men behind the curtain" orchestrating the "great and powerful Oz," the aim is power politics, pure and simple. They could not care less about socialism, or communism, or social justice; for them, these pursuits are just means to an end - an end where they are the real "masters" of the world, as evidenced by their ability to manipulate world events to their own satisfaction.

What is the goal that these "masters" hope to achieve in our body politic with the "Occupy" movement? In my mind, they want to foster a permanent, revolutionary block within our own political life, one that does not accept the resolution of the ballot box as the final say on the merits of their agenda. Most countries around the world, including the so-called democratic countries that constitute the European Union today, have revolutionary blocks - sometimes armed militias - within their numbers. In these countries, elections are always precarious to some degree, because the revolutionaries stand ready to assume power with street protests and Molotov cocktails, if and when the voters go against them. For them, what prevails will not be the overriding consensus of reasonable voters, but whatever the few force upon the many through intimidation, strikes, and even violence. Soros and his ilk want the same type of revolutionary block to be a permanent part of our political life, so that we never again will be able to presume that elections settle matters, or that our common rule of law will prevail over self-interested, brute force. They want to de-Americanize America - rip to shreds what makes us truly distinctive from the rest of the world - and turn us into just another corrupt oligarchy, a faux republic that masks global tyranny under the guise of "respect for workers" and "social justice." It is not that they want to get rid of capitalism, so much as control the levers of the global, capitalist system for their own benefit. They want the ultimate in crony capitalism, a global system of labor and commerce that keeps a few at the top, eliminates effectively the middle class, and enslaves the great mass of men. The great irony is that the "men behind the curtain" who are financing the "Occupy" movement want to foster the very same crony capitalism - except on a global scale - that the rank and file "Occupiers" oppose. Thus, we may see how the "Occupiers" on the streets are "useful idiots," in that they are unwittingly aiding in the creation of a global system that is inimical to their stated ideals.

In summary, the "Occupy" movement may seem to be an assault on capitalism; and that is indeed the real goal of most of the rank and file street protesters. Nevertheless, for the men behind the curtain, the financiers like Soros and others, the real goal is fostering in America an anti-democratic impulse, one that seeks change through intimidation and violence, rather than through the normal process of elections. They know that if and when America ceases to be in line with her own Declaration of Independence, when she ceases to be a nation that allows for her own citizens to be self-governing, and that upholds the rule of law as ultimate in the affairs of men, then there will be no nation on earth obstructing their reach for power.

A Letter from a Friend to Michael Erickson

Thank you for taking the time to respond. It is all as I suspected (of course I knew from you it would be more eloquently put and more thoroughly understood.) I have been deeply saddened by this attack on our freedom ironically perpetrated by misguided individuals who ultimately will suffer the most from the change for which they are campaigning. Kind of makes you wonder--is there any intelligent life out there? I am not sure what to do but pray and ask God to raise honorable men to combat this evil that is taking root in the world and threatening our way of life. I hope all is well with you and Sharon and that you are making a dent in restoring intelligence to politics.

A Response from Michael Erickson to the Friend

Sharon and I have taken an extended hiatus from politics. We are now residing in the town of San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato, Mexico, which is roughly three hours drive north of Mexico City. We have been here since the end of August and have signed a lease to stay at least another year. In the meantime, we have rented out our home in California. Part of the reason for taking an extended hiatus from politics is our awareness that we are unable to do anything of significance in California. As you may recall, I had been the actual proponent of a statewide initiative against illegal immigration last year. In spite of obtaining several weeks worth of national and statewide media coverage (including interviews on the Fox News Channel), and making appeals to Tea Party and Republican Party leaders around the State, I garnered less than a thousand dollars in donations. In order to pay people to do the collecting of signatures needed to qualify an initiative (which is necessary, as there will never be enough volunteer signature gatherers to succeed at such a monumental task), an initiative campaign of this sort must raise somewhere between a half a million and a million dollars. We had one of the more compelling issues of our time - an issue frankly that must be tackled, if we in California are going to be serious about turning the tide on our financial doldrums - and yet raised less than a thousand dollars. Needless to say, with so little funds in hand, I did not begin the process of collecting signatures. I had to watch as our initiative campaign whimpered into death - much to the happiness of Republican Party officials who privately worked to make sure that we would never raise any serious money, because they fear more than anything else the prospect of an initiative that may displease some Hispanic voters. I know that economic times are tough and that middle class people do not have the funds that they once may have had to support political campaigns. Nevertheless, even in a Depression, there are always people with enough money to launch initiative campaigns; and when the rubber hit the road these people just did not come through on behalf of one of the most compelling social and financial issues facing the State of California today. I was disappointed with the outcome of this initiative campaign, to be sure; but what really convinced me that there was no longer hope for a conservative revival in California - apart from the direct intervention of God of course - was the failure of Republican candidates in statewide campaigns in 2010. The great tidal wave that year that swept Republicans - and Tea Party Republicans in particular - into power broke somewhere against the ragged cliffs of the Rocky Mountains. We not only lost across the board; we lost by the same margins by which we normally lose, thus showing that there was not even a slight trend in our favor. The fact is that too many "producers" - natural Republican voters - have moved out of the State in favor of the lower taxes and less burdensome regulations of States such as Texas and even North Dakota (lowest unemployment rate in the United States, because it is now drilling oil, while the federal government tries to block the same). They have been replaced by an ever growing army of "takers" - natural Democrat voters - who simply want to leech off of the public coffers. Add into the mix the many millions of illegal immigrants, who have no interest in assimilating into our American culture, and we may see why California rapidly is becoming a third world "banana republic," where a few at the top (union bosses working hand in hand with leftist, corporate heads) control most of the wealth for themselves, while keeping the vast majority mired somewhere below middle class status. The American way of life is sustained in a vibrant middle class; when the middle class can no longer afford to live in California, then California will cease to be a recognizably American State. I fear that that is what is happening there and that indeed we may have passed the point of return. Thus, while Sharon and I remain interested in politics from afar, we are no longer directly in the mix. In my mind, if ever I decide to return to active involvement in politics, it will be in a State where a Republican like myself at least has a chance of making a difference. I shall not spend the rest of my life being a modern day "Don Quixote," tossing my lance at those proverbial windmills, and exercising my energies on lost causes. Let us keep in touch, as we value your friendship. Kindly give our regards to your husband. May God bless you both in all that you do and may you both always realize the love of Our Lord Jesus Christ in this lifetime and in the heavenly one to come.

A Second Letter from the Friend to Michael Erickson

I hear you Michael. I sincerely tried to make a difference in politics about 10 years ago and was astounded by the hostility with which I was greeted. I gave up then and was impressed by the headway you made. As little as it was -- you have done more than others (including myself) who tried. There are people here who should step up and do something before their way of life is destroyed, but most of them have checked out and talk about leaving the state. It's like a veil is over the area; and my personal opinion is that our nation is no longer blessed, as we have turned our back on God. Until this apathy shifts and/or a revival occurs, there isn't much that the few of us can do who are left but pray. It's sad to be sure but you are wise to recognize a lost cause when you see one. Prayers are the only thing that can save us now. I was very glad to hear from you and get an update. It is good to know that you and Sharon are safe and happy. Do keep in touch. If you ever come back for a visit, we would love to have you stay with us. We are stuck here because all four of our children reside here, and neither Vic nor myself are inclined to leave them behind. We've talked about selling the house and maybe buying a condo and having two residences; but Vic's children are not yet out of the house, so here we stay although California (while still beautiful) is no longer the Golden State I remember from childhood. Peace and best wishes to you.